Judge Richard G. Andrews recently granted motions to dismiss direct, indirect, and willful infringement claims under Rule 12(b)(6) in five related cases. Network Managing Solutions, LLC v. AT&T Inc., et al., C.A. No. 16-295, 16-296, 16-297, 16-298, 16-299 (RGA) (D. Del. Feb. 3, 2017). The Court found insufficient the allegation that the “3rd Generation Partnership Project Standards incorporate the technologies covered by the patents” because it was pled on information and belief. The Court explained, “Plaintiff knows its own patents. The standards are public. Saying on ‘information and belief’ that the standards ‘incorporate the fundamental technologies’ covered by the patents, without more, is insufficient to plausibly allege that the practice the standard necessarily means that a defendant also practices the patent.” The Court found the indirect infringement allegations insufficient for the additional reasons that the complaint failed to identify any third party that actually infringes, and failed to plausibly claim that the Defendants specifically intended to induce infringement. In turn, while recognizing that the plaintiff adequately alleged knowledge of its patent, the Court dismissed the willful infringement claim because it was based on insufficiently pled infringement claims.