Judge Robinson recently considered evidentiary disputes in advance of trial. SRI Int’l Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc., C.A. No. 13-1534-SLR (D. Del. Apr. 22, 2016). Among other things, Judge Robinson denied Cisco’s request for its expert to provide a supplemental opinion to rebut plaintiff’s expert’s infringement opinion on the “based on the analysis of network data” limitation. In the Court’s view, such a request was an attempt to reargue claim construction. Id. at ¶ 2. Judge Robinson concluded that the request was based on Cisco’s expert’s failure to address plaintiff’s expert’s opinion in the alternative. Id. “Under the circumstances, I see no reason to allow Cisco to finally amend its position on the eve of trial with a supplemental expert report. The issue should be one of claim construction for purposes of appeal.” Id.