In a recent oral order, Chief Judge Leonard P. Stark granted defendants’ request for an extension of time to comply with the Court’s Order granting a permanent injunction, entered June 30, 2014. Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor Int’l, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 08-309-LPS, D.I. 798 (D. Del. July 3, 2014) (permanent injunction discussed previously here). In a letter to the Court, defendants asserted that they “simply cannot implement this type of system level change immediately as required by the Court Order, and would prefer to comply rather than to risk immediately violating the Order.” (D.I. 795 at 1.) Judge Stark permitted defendants until July 31, 2014 to fully comply with the permanent injunction. (D.I. 798.)
Further, Paragraph 8 of the permanent injunction order required defendants “to include a copy of this Order Granting Permanent Injunction with any product that [defendants] deliver outside the United States” in addition to a notice provision specified by the Court. (D.I. 794.) Judge Stark found that defendants “may comply with Paragraph 8 of the injunction order by clearly printing the Court’s notice on the cover of every box of infringing products so long as the notice includes a URL to the Court’s order and all customers are provided with a copy of the Court’s injunction order prior to their purchasing any of the enjoined products outside of the U.S.” (D.I. 798.) Judge Stark reasoned that “[a]lthough the Court is troubled that [defendants] did not raise this notice issue prior to the Court’s granting the injunction, and the Court today provides [defendant] [their] belatedly requested relief reluctantly, the Court is persuaded that the purpose of the notice provision in Paragraph 8 will be satisfied so long as [defendants] compl[y] with the foregoing obligations.” Id.