Posted On: February 1, 2013 by Pilar G. Kraman

Motion for leave to file second amended complaint denied due to delay resulting from adding a new defendant that was an Indian corporation

Judge Richard G. Andrews recently denied plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint that would add two additional defendants, one of which was an Indian corporation with a principal place of business in India. Howard Foundation Holdings Ltd. v. Int'l Vitamin Corp., C.A. No. 12-35-RGA (D. Del. Jan. 28, 2013). Although the motion was timely, Judge Andrews noted that the claim construction process had already begun and a claim cosntruction hearing was scheduled for April. Granting the motion would "necessitate a lengthy postponement in the case[,]" and Plaintiff can separately sue the two proposed defendants.

Howard Foundation Holdings Ltd. v. Int'l Vitamin Corp., C.A. No. 12-35-RGA (D. Del. Jan. 28, 2013) by